| Title |
Reactions to male‐favouring versus female‐favouring sex differences: A pre‐registered experiment and Southeast Asian replication
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Psychology, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/bjop.12463 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steve Stewart‐Williams, Chern Yi Marybeth Chang, Xiu Ling Wong, Jesse D. Blackburn, Andrew G. Thomas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 390 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 28 | 7% |
| Spain | 21 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 5% |
| Canada | 11 | 3% |
| Belgium | 10 | 3% |
| Germany | 9 | 2% |
| Australia | 7 | 2% |
| Mexico | 7 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 50 | 13% |
| Unknown | 225 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 336 | 86% |
| Scientists | 37 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 17% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 11 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 295. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2024.
All research outputs
#121,274
of 25,850,376 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Psychology
#15
of 1,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,018
of 430,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Psychology
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.