| Title |
3D Printing of Microgel‐Loaded Modular Microcages as Instructive Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advanced Materials, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/adma.202001736 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ramesh Subbiah, Christina Hipfinger, Anthony Tahayeri, Avathamsa Athirasala, Sivaporn Horsophonphong, Greeshma Thrivikraman, Cristiane Miranda França, Diana Araujo Cunha, Amin Mansoorifar, Albena Zahariev, James M. Jones, Paulo G. Coelho, Lukasz Witek, Hua Xie, Robert E. Guldberg, Luiz E. Bertassoni |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 14% |
| India | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 28% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 22 | 22% |
| Chemical Engineering | 9 | 9% |
| Materials Science | 8 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 34 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 246. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2022.
All research outputs
#138,100
of 23,896,578 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Materials
#51
of 15,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,636
of 402,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Materials
#3
of 302 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,896,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 302 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.