↓ Skip to main content

Wiley Online Library

3D Printing of Microgel‐Loaded Modular Microcages as Instructive Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering

Overview of attention for article published in Advanced Materials, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
28 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
3D Printing of Microgel‐Loaded Modular Microcages as Instructive Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering
Published in
Advanced Materials, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/adma.202001736
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ramesh Subbiah, Christina Hipfinger, Anthony Tahayeri, Avathamsa Athirasala, Sivaporn Horsophonphong, Greeshma Thrivikraman, Cristiane Miranda França, Diana Araujo Cunha, Amin Mansoorifar, Albena Zahariev, James M. Jones, Paulo G. Coelho, Lukasz Witek, Hua Xie, Robert E. Guldberg, Luiz E. Bertassoni

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 28%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Master 7 7%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 29 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 22 22%
Chemical Engineering 9 9%
Materials Science 8 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 34 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 246. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2022.
All research outputs
#138,100
of 23,896,578 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Materials
#51
of 15,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,636
of 402,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Materials
#3
of 302 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,896,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 302 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.