| Title |
AAPM medical physics practice guideline 10.a.: Scope of practice for clinical medical physics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/acm2.12469 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica B. Clements, Christopher T. Baird, Steven F. de Boer, Lynne A. Fairobent, Tyler Fisher, James H. Goodwin, Dustin A. Gress, Jennifer Lynn Johnson, Kathryn L. Kolsky, Gig S. Mageras, Rebecca M. Marsh, Melissa C. Martin, Brent Parker, Daniel C. Pavord, Michael C. Schell, J. Anthony Seibert, Donna M. Stevens, Russell B. Tarver, Christopher G. Waite‐Jones, Nicholai Wingreen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 19% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 22% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 24% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,350,533
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#234
of 2,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,273
of 360,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.