| Title |
Quality assurance for computed‐tomography simulators and the computed‐tomography‐simulation process: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 66
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Physics, September 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1118/1.1609271 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sasa Mutic, Jatinder R. Palta, Elizabeth K. Butker, Indra J. Das, M. Saiful Huq, Leh‐Nien Dick Loo, Bill J. Salter, Cynthia H. McCollough, Jacob Van Dyk |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 606 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 8 | 1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 1% |
| Unknown | 576 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 89 | 15% |
| Researcher | 83 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 82 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 79 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 7% |
| Other | 120 | 20% |
| Unknown | 113 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 240 | 40% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 126 | 21% |
| Engineering | 32 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 34 | 6% |
| Unknown | 139 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2021.
All research outputs
#5,629,250
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Medical Physics
#871
of 8,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,685
of 58,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Physics
#3
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,077 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.