| Title |
Silencing the alarm: an insect salivary enzyme closes plant stomata and inhibits volatile release
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New Phytologist, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/nph.17214 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Po‐An Lin, Yintong Chen, Duverney Chaverra‐Rodriguez, Chan Chin Heu, Nursyafiqi Bin Zainuddin, Jagdeep Singh Sidhu, Michelle Peiffer, Ching‐Wen Tan, Anjel Helms, Donghun Kim, Jared Ali, Jason L. Rasgon, Jonathan Lynch, Charles T. Anderson, Gary W. Felton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 9% |
| France | 4 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Finland | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 57% |
| Scientists | 30 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 32 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 383. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2022.
All research outputs
#80,625
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from New Phytologist
#7
of 9,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,642
of 455,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Phytologist
#2
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.